79 351 w/84 c6 to 94 5.0

Engine, ignition, fuel, cooling, exhaust

Moderators: Ranchero50, DuckRyder

Post Reply
boyle05
New Member
New Member
Posts: 25
Joined: Fri Jun 19, 2009 6:19 pm

79 351 w/84 c6 to 94 5.0

Post by boyle05 »

we have a 71 f100 with a 79 or so 351 and 84 c6, we have a 94 5.0 that we would like to install. just wondering if it would be a problem or not . the engine is coming out of a 94 bronco full size 4x4. our 71 is 2 wheel. was wondering about transmission to engine and engine to perches and motor mounts. we have a new in cab tank, does the bronco have the in tank fuel pump? i guess the tank at the rear of the bronco will not work. thanks for any help and advice.
fordman
100% FORDified!
100% FORDified!
Posts: 22329
Joined: Sun Aug 28, 2005 8:17 pm
Location: Kansas, Ottawa
Contact:

Re: 79 351 w/84 c6 to 94 5.0

Post by fordman »

motor mounts are the same fo rthe 351w's. the fuel injected engine does have the high pressure in tank fuel pump.
User avatar
TX69F100
New Member
New Member
Posts: 192
Joined: Mon Jun 14, 2010 1:30 pm
Location: Sunnyvale, TX

Re: 79 351 w/84 c6 to 94 5.0

Post by TX69F100 »

Finding an external in-line fuel pump that provides the proper pressure/flow should be easy enough. You may have to use a regulator (with return), which is not too difficult.
Brent

1969 F100 Ranger 390/C6 <--- Build thread
boyle05
New Member
New Member
Posts: 25
Joined: Fri Jun 19, 2009 6:19 pm

Re: 79 351 w/84 c6 to 94 5.0

Post by boyle05 »

should there be an issue with all the sensors- map, o2 etc. for the 5.0 . i guess i will need to transfer all the under hood fuse boxes and wiring. will i need to do any inside the cab rewiring. i also wonder about the engine transmission combo. the 94 5.0 with the 84 c6. would it connect the same with the vaccuum and kickdown or is the 94 electric. i am trying to make sure i don't get in the middle of this and find out something major won't work. i get what you are saying about the external fuel pump. thanks
User avatar
basketcase0302
100% FORDified!
100% FORDified!
Posts: 6805
Joined: Thu Jan 26, 2006 7:11 am
Location: Hawthorne, Florida

Re: 79 351 w/84 c6 to 94 5.0

Post by basketcase0302 »

we have a 71 f100 with a 79 or so 351


351W or 351M? Aren't the bolt patterns/bellhousing patterns different between the two?
I believe the 79 trucks had the 351M?
http://www.fordification.com/tech/engineID-V8.htm
Jeff
http://www.fordification.com/forum/view ... 22&t=46251
SOLD-71 F-350 dually flatbed, 302 / .030 over V-8 with a "baby"C-6, B & M truckshifter, Dana70/4.11 ratio, intermittent wipers, tilt steering, full LED lighting on the flat bed, and no stereo yet (this way I can hear the rattles to diagnose)! SOLD!
Many Ford bumps / one 76' EB / and several dents through the years.
A lot of "oddball" Ford parts collected from working on them for 34 years now!
2008 Ford Escape 4 x 4
User avatar
TX69F100
New Member
New Member
Posts: 192
Joined: Mon Jun 14, 2010 1:30 pm
Location: Sunnyvale, TX

Re: 79 351 w/84 c6 to 94 5.0

Post by TX69F100 »

I suppose a decent manifold vacuum source should operate the C6 modulator just fine (may have to use an adjustable modulator and tweak it some for desired shift points). I'm not sure how tough the kickdown will be, but you can always use a Lokar cable if you can't manage to make the factory linkage work.
Brent

1969 F100 Ranger 390/C6 <--- Build thread
Post Reply